Neal Yanofsky v. Buff City Soap Investco, LLC, Michael Sutton and Guideboat Capital Partners, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 27, 2022·No. 05-22-00957-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered October 27, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00957-CV

NEAL YANOFSKY, Appellant

V.

BUFF CITY SOAP INVESTCO, LLC, MICHAEL SUTTON AND GUIDEBOAT CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-09871

ORDER

It is well-settled that the timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional and an untimely appeal must be dismissed. See Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C., 302 S.W.3d 542, 545 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.) (op. on reh’g); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26, a notice of appeal must generally be filed within thirty days of the date of judgment or, if certain post-judgment motions are filed, within ninety days of the date of judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26, 26.1.

The appeal here was filed September 22, 2022 and challenges a judgment dated August 25, 2021. Based on the date of judgment, the appeal is untimely. The clerk’s record, however, includes a copy of an agreed motion for judgment nunc pro tunc filed in the trial court on September 20, 2022, seeking to have the date of the judgment corrected to August 25, 2022, the date the judgment was allegedly signed. See In re Taylor, 113 S.W.3d 385, 393 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (“[A] judgment nunc pro tunc may be issued to correct the date an order was signed if the original date is shown to have been incorrect.”). The record does not reflect that the motion has been set for hearing, but an appellate court cannot dismiss an appeal based on a trial court error that is remediable. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4. Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to determine the agreed motion no later than November 14, 2022. See id. A supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of the trial court’s order, any nunc pro tunc judgment, and the trial court’s docket sheet, shall be filed no later than November 16, 2022. We caution appellant that the appeal will be dismissed without further notice should the trial court not find the date of judgment is incorrect. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Brashear, 302 S.W.3d at 545.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Gena Slaughter, Presiding Judge of the 191st Judicial District Court; Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre; and, the parties.

We SUSPEND the deadline for the filing of appellant’s brief and ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court an opportunity to comply with this order. The appeal will be reinstated no later than November 21, 2022.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neal Yanofsky v. Buff City Soap Investco, LLC, Michael Sutton and Guideboat Capital Partners, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Neal Yanofsky v. Buff City Soap Investco, LLC, Michael Sutton and Guideboat Capital Partners, LLC (Neal Yanofsky v. Buff City Soap Investco, LLC, Michael Sutton and Guideboat Capital Partners, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Taylor
113 S.W.3d 385 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C.
302 S.W.3d 542 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)