Neal v. Weaver

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Neal v. Weaver

223 So. 2d 411, 254 La. 290, 1969 La. LEXIS 2884

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 13, 1969

DocketNo. 49871

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 223 So. 2d 411 (Neal v. Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neal v. Weaver, 223 So. 2d 411, 254 La. 290, 1969 La. LEXIS 2884 (La. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Raful Neal, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 220 So.2d 751.

[291]*291Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.

FOURNET, C. J.,

is of the opinion that the facts of this case from which the court of appeal based its conclusion the plaintiff was contributorily negligent does not support that conclusion and therefore the judgment of the District Judge should have been- affirmed:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Raful Neal, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 220 So.2d 751.

[291]*291Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.

FOURNET, C. J.,

is of the opinion that the facts of this case from which the court of appeal based its conclusion the plaintiff was contributorily negligent does not support that conclusion and therefore the judgment of the District Judge should have been- affirmed:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 So. 2d 411, 254 La. 290, 1969 La. LEXIS 2884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-weaver-la-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack