Neal v. Stevens
150 S.E.2d 783, 268 N.C. 452, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1229
Opinion
The pleadings are analyzed in the opinion of this Court when the cause was here on a former appeal. Neal v. Stevens, 266 N.C. 96, 145 S.E. 2d 325. The evidence on the second trial was not essentially different from that discussed in the former opinion. From sufficient evidence and under a correct charge, the jury found both parties to the accident were negligent. In the judgment in accordance with the verdict, we find
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Neal v. Stevens, 150 S.E.2d 783, 268 N.C. 452, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1229 (N.C. 1966).
150 S.E.2d 783 (Neal v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Neal v. Stevens
145 S.E.2d 325 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)