Neal v. Stevens

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Neal v. Stevens

150 S.E.2d 783, 268 N.C. 452, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1229

DecidedNovember 2, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 150 S.E.2d 783 (Neal v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neal v. Stevens, 150 S.E.2d 783, 268 N.C. 452, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1229 (N.C. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The pleadings are analyzed in the opinion of this Court when the cause was here on a former appeal. Neal v. Stevens, 266 N.C. 96, 145 S.E. 2d 325. The evidence on the second trial was not essentially different from that discussed in the former opinion. From sufficient evidence and under a correct charge, the jury found both parties to the accident were negligent. In the judgment in accordance with the verdict, we find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The pleadings are analyzed in the opinion of this Court when the cause was here on a former appeal. Neal v. Stevens, 266 N.C. 96, 145 S.E. 2d 325. The evidence on the second trial was not essentially different from that discussed in the former opinion. From sufficient evidence and under a correct charge, the jury found both parties to the accident were negligent. In the judgment in accordance with the verdict, we find

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 S.E.2d 783, 268 N.C. 452, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-stevens-nc-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack