Neal v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Neal v. State

530 S.W.3d 613

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 17, 2017

DocketED 105261

StatusPublished

This text of 530 S.W.3d 613 (Neal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neal v. State, 530 S.W.3d 613 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURlAJVf.

.Elton Neal (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.036 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial .court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURlAJVf.

.Elton Neal (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.036 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial .court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

530 S.W.3d 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-state-moctapp-2017.