Neal v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Neal v. State

530 S.W.3d 613

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 17, 2017·No. ED 105261·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURlAJVf.

.Elton Neal (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.036 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial .court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURlAJVf.

.Elton Neal (“Movant”) appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.036 post-conviction relief motion. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial .court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Neal v. State, 530 S.W.3d 613 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

530 S.W.3d 613 (Neal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.