Neal v. State
238 S.W.3d 730, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1550, 2007 WL 3340928
Opinion
ORDER
Columbus Neal appeals from the judgment denying his “Motion to Reopen 29.15 Legal Proceedings.” Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Neal v. State, 238 S.W.3d 730, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1550, 2007 WL 3340928 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
238 S.W.3d 730 (Neal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
LITTY v. Bliss
238 S.W.3d 730 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)