Neal v. State

923 So. 2d 596, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4232, 2006 WL 733992
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Neal v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 854 So. 2d 666
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 2006·No. No. 5D06-592·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny Harry Neal’s petition for belated appeal. While Neal’s petition included an unnotarized oath, he failed to execute it. Our dismissal is without prejudice so that Neal may file a timely and properly sworn petition.

PETITION DENIED.

SHARP, W., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neal v. State, 923 So. 2d 596, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4232, 2006 WL 733992 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

923 So. 2d 596 (Neal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.