Neal v. State

835 So. 2d 1173, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18610, 2002 WL 31833883
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Neal v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 854 So. 2d 666
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 2002·No. No. 1D02-3010·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ronnie Maurice Neal petitions this court for a belated appeal of a February 2000 order denying his motion for postconviction relief, alleging that despite the assurances of an inmate law clerk that a timely [1174]*1174notice of appeal would be filed, no appeal was initiated. Neal’s petition to this court was filed in July 2002, and is thus untimely pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(4)(A). More to the point, however, the court’s records reflect that a timely appeal of the trial court’s February 2000 order was initiated, and that order was affirmed without comment in August 2000. See Neal v. State, 768 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Accordingly, we deny the petition for belated appeal.

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neal v. State, 835 So. 2d 1173, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18610, 2002 WL 31833883 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

835 So. 2d 1173 (Neal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.