Neal v. State
This text of 234 So. 2d 158 (Neal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals a judgment and sentence entered by the trial judge sitting without a jury.
Appellant argues two points on his appeal, to-wit: (1) the evidence was insufficient; and (2) certain monies were improperly admitted into evidence.
As to the second point, the appellant did not assign as error the admission of the monies into evidence and, therefore, cannot rely upon this point for reversal.1
As to appellant’s fir^t point, we have carefully examined the record-on-appeal and conclude that there is ample evidence upon which to sustain the judgment and sentence appealed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 So. 2d 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-state-fladistctapp-1970.