Neal v. State

234 So. 2d 158
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 18, 1970
DocketNo. 69-418
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 234 So. 2d 158 (Neal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neal v. State, 234 So. 2d 158 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals a judgment and sentence entered by the trial judge sitting without a jury.

Appellant argues two points on his appeal, to-wit: (1) the evidence was insufficient; and (2) certain monies were improperly admitted into evidence.

As to the second point, the appellant did not assign as error the admission of the monies into evidence and, therefore, cannot rely upon this point for reversal.1

As to appellant’s fir^t point, we have carefully examined the record-on-appeal and conclude that there is ample evidence upon which to sustain the judgment and sentence appealed.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Navarro v. State
264 So. 2d 469 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 So. 2d 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-state-fladistctapp-1970.