Neal v. Puckett

264 F.3d 1149
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Neal v. Puckett. Read the opinion of the Court — 286 F.3d 230
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 6, 2001·No. 99-60511·Published

Opinion

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neal v. Puckett, 264 F.3d 1149 (5th Cir. 2001).

264 F.3d 1149 (Neal v. Puckett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neal v. Puckett
264 F.3d 1149 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)