Neal v. Old North State Land Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Neal v. Old North State Land Co.

17 S.E. 538, 112 N.C. 841

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 5, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 17 S.E. 538 (Neal v. Old North State Land Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neal v. Old North State Land Co., 17 S.E. 538, 112 N.C. 841 (N.C. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Ouriaji :

The additional explanatory affidavit of the Clerk does not alter the case. The motion to re-instate must he denied. The neglect of counsel to have the record printed is the neglect of the party himself and does not excuse. Edwards v. Henderson, 109 N. C., 83, and numerous cases there cited. In that case it is said: “Appellants might as well fail to send up the transcript as not to have it in a condition to be heard by failing to have the 'case and exceptions’ printed.”

Motion Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Ouriaji :

The additional explanatory affidavit of the Clerk does not alter the case. The motion to re-instate must he denied. The neglect of counsel to have the record printed is the neglect of the party himself and does not excuse. Edwards v. Henderson, 109 N. C., 83, and numerous cases there cited. In that case it is said: “Appellants might as well fail to send up the transcript as not to have it in a condition to be heard by failing to have the 'case and exceptions’ printed.”

Motion Denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 S.E. 538, 112 N.C. 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-old-north-state-land-co-nc-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack