Neal v. Ohio Oil Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Neal v. Ohio Oil Co.

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 250

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 7, 1927

DocketNo. 20374

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 250 (Neal v. Ohio Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neal v. Ohio Oil Co., 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 250 (Ohio 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Treva L. Neal filed a claim for the compensation for the death of her husband with the Industrial Commission. The claim was denied May 12, and on June 11, 1926, twenty-nine days after the denial by the Commission, Neal filed a petition in the Wood Common Pleas, and the Ohio Oil Company filed a motion to quash service upon the ground that Neal had not filed an application for a rehearing with the Commission.

Neal contends in the Supreme Court:

1. Neither the legislature nor the parties, employee and employer by agreement, can abridge the right of trial by jury if the claim is _ denied on the grounds that the evidence fails to show that the injury was received in the course of employment.

2. The right to appeal to the court for redress of wrongs is one of those rights which in its nature under our constitution is inalienable and cannot be withheld.

Note — OA. oninion, 5 Abs. 34. Motion to-certify overruled, 5 Abs. 250.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Treva L. Neal filed a claim for the compensation for the death of her husband with the Industrial Commission. The claim was denied May 12, and on June 11, 1926, twenty-nine days after the denial by the Commission, Neal filed a petition in the Wood Common Pleas, and the Ohio Oil Company filed a motion to quash service upon the ground that Neal had not filed an application for a rehearing with the Commission.

Neal contends in the Supreme Court:

1. Neither the legislature nor the parties, employee and employer by agreement, can abridge the right of trial by jury if the claim is _ denied on the grounds that the evidence fails to show that the injury was received in the course of employment.

2. The right to appeal to the court for redress of wrongs is one of those rights which in its nature under our constitution is inalienable and cannot be withheld.

Note — OA. oninion, 5 Abs. 34. Motion to-certify overruled, 5 Abs. 250.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-ohio-oil-co-ohio-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack