Neal v. Neal

Nebraska Supreme Court

Neal v. Neal

470 N.W.2d 803, 238 Neb. 443, 1991 Neb. LEXIS 247

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided June 21, 1991·No. No. 89-391·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a dissolution of marriage decree dated March 31, 1989, entered by the district court for Douglas County. The sole issue raised by the parties on appeal and cross-appeal is the amount of alimony awarded the appellee spouse. Awards of alimony are initially entrusted to the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal unless the record establishes that the trial court has abused its discretion. Dinovo v. Dinovo, ante p. 285, 470 N.W.2d 174 (1991). Reviewing the judgment of the trial court de novo on the record and finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the judgment. See Schulze v. Schulze, ante p. 81, 469 N.W.2d 139 (1991).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a dissolution of marriage decree dated March 31, 1989, entered by the district court for Douglas County. The sole issue raised by the parties on appeal and cross-appeal is the amount of alimony awarded the appellee spouse. Awards of alimony are initially entrusted to the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal unless the record establishes that the trial court has abused its discretion. Dinovo v. Dinovo, ante p. 285, 470 N.W.2d 174 (1991). Reviewing the judgment of the trial court de novo on the record and finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the judgment. See Schulze v. Schulze, ante p. 81, 469 N.W.2d 139 (1991).

Affirmed.

Neal v. Neal, 470 N.W.2d 803, 238 Neb. 443, 1991 Neb. LEXIS 247 (Neb. 1991).

Pincite

470 N.W.2d 803 (Neal v. Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related