Neal v. Miller
This text of Neal v. Miller (Neal v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6773
WILBERT ANTHONY NEAL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STEVEN C. MILLER, Supervising, US Probation Officer; STEVEN LABIER, Bureau of Prison; JOSEPH B. STEELMAN, JR., Chief, US Probation Office,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JAMES A. BEATY, JR., United States District Judge,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-03-134-9-10BG)
Submitted: July 10, 2003 Decided: July 17, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilbert Anthony Neal, Appellant Pro Se. Robert F. Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Wilbert Anthony Neal seeks to appeal the district court’s
order granting Appellees’ motion for partial summary judgment and
removing a federal district court judge from the complaint. This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Neal seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We deny Neal’s motions for appointment of counsel and
for oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Neal v. Miller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-miller-ca4-2003.