Neal v. . MacE

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Neal v. . MacE

89 N.C. 171

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 5, 1883

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 89 N.C. 171 (Neal v. . MacE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neal v. . MacE, 89 N.C. 171 (N.C. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Merrimon, J.

It does not appear in the record that any case has been settled upon appeal for this court, nor are errors assigned in the record. Upon examination, we find that the court has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter of the action. In such a case the judgment will be affirmed. Swepson v. Clayton, 74 N. C., 551; Bryant v. Fisher, 85 N. C., (369; McDaniel v. Pollock, 87 N. C., 503. Judgment affirmed. Let this be certified.

No error. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merrimon, J.

It does not appear in the record that any case has been settled upon appeal for this court, nor are errors assigned in the record. Upon examination, we find that the court has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter of the action. In such a case the judgment will be affirmed. Swepson v. Clayton, 74 N. C., 551; Bryant v. Fisher, 85 N. C., (369; McDaniel v. Pollock, 87 N. C., 503. Judgment affirmed. Let this be certified.

No error. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 N.C. 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-mace-nc-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack