Neal v. Lyle

1923 OK 835, 220 P. 462, 96 Okla. 135, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 235
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 23, 1923·No. 14479·Published

Opinion

HARRISON, J.

By agreement of parties the decision in this case may follow the decision in No. 14478, Schoemann v. Southgate, 96 Okla. 106, 220 Pac. 461. The facts in the two cases being substantially the same and the law governing the state of facts in each case being identical, except that in the case at bar the defendant in error was elected to the office of city clerk of the town of Wanette at the same election in which defendant in error in Schoemann v. Southgate, supra, was elected city treasurer.

A separate judgment in the instant case was rendfered in favor of Lyle, and peremptory writ issued to plaintiff' in error, Neal, to turn over to Lyle the office of city clerk and the things belonging thereto.

Following the reasoning and the law announced in Schoemann v. Southgate, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and KANE, KENNAMER, NICHOLSON, COCHRAN, BRANSON, and MASON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neal v. Lyle, 1923 OK 835, 220 P. 462, 96 Okla. 135, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 235 (Okla. 1923).

1923 OK 835 (Neal v. Lyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schoemann v. Southgate
1923 OK 844 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)