Neal v. Industrial Accident Commission
This text of 171 P. 696 (Neal v. Industrial Accident Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner in the above-entitled case seeks a writ of certiorari to review the proceedings wherein, on his application to the respondent above named for a rehearing, his petition was denied. It appears from the petition herein that the order denying the rehearing of which petitioner makes complaint was made and entered December 22, 1917. Section 67(a) of the Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act of 1917 (Stats. 1917, p. 875) provides that “within thirty days after the application for a rehearing is denied, or, if the application is granted, within thirty days after the rendition of the decision on the rehearing, any party affected thereby may apply to the supreme court of this state, or to the district court of appeal of the appellate district in which such person resides, for a writ of certiorari or review, . . . for the purpose of having the lawfulness of the original order, rule, regulation, decision or *41 award, or the order, rule, regulation, decision or award on rehearing inquired into and determined.”
The petition was received at the office of the clerk of this court and was filed on January 24, 1918. The application for the writ comes too late and the writ is, therefore, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 P. 696, 36 Cal. App. 40, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-industrial-accident-commission-calctapp-1918.