Neal v. Henderson

72 Ga. 209
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 2, 1884·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Where a person seeks to enjoin a judgment at law, the bill should set forth clearly and distinctly the grounds upon which the complainant’s equity rests; and if it shows upon its face that the judgment at law was rendered by reason of his own negligence in not making the necessary defence, a court of equity will not grant relief by injunction. Code, §3120; 71 Ga., 523.

(a.) Where, after the foreclosure of a mortgage, the defendant filed an affidavit of illegality to the execution thereon, upon the ground that it had been paid, and the issue formed by such affidavit was - passed upon by a jury, who found in favor of the plaintiff in ft. fa., upon a bill then filed to enjoin the execution, an injunction should have been refused.*

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neal v. Henderson, 72 Ga. 209 (Ga. 1884).

72 Ga. 209 (Neal v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Ft. Pierre v. Hall
104 N.W. 470 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1905)