Neal v. Henderson

72 Ga. 209
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 2, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 72 Ga. 209 (Neal v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neal v. Henderson, 72 Ga. 209 (Ga. 1884).

Opinion

Where a person seeks to enjoin a judgment at law, the bill should set forth clearly and distinctly the grounds upon which the complainant’s equity rests; and if it shows upon its face that the judgment at law was rendered by reason of his own negligence in not making the necessary defence, a court of equity will not grant relief by injunction. Code, §3120; 71 Ga., 523.

(a.) Where, after the foreclosure of a mortgage, the defendant filed an affidavit of illegality to the execution thereon, upon the ground that it had been paid, and the issue formed by such affidavit was - passed upon by a jury, who found in favor of the plaintiff in ft. fa., upon a bill then filed to enjoin the execution, an injunction should have been refused.*

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Ft. Pierre v. Hall
104 N.W. 470 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 Ga. 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-henderson-ga-1884.