Neal v. Green
This text of 413 P.2d 339 (Neal v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondents have moved to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with the requirements pertaining to timely filing of the appeal bond, transcript and statement of facts.
*416 We find no prejudice to respondents resulting from the late filing of the appeal bond.
Although we find that the transcript and statement of facts were filed late, this court is hesitant to punish litigants for neglect of their counsel. Timely filing of a transcript and statement of facts is not a jurisdictional prerequisite to review. Beagle v. Beagle, 55 Wn.2d 908, 349 P.2d 241 (1960).
In the circumstances of this case, in the exercise of our discretion, we conditionally deny the motion providing appellants file their opening brief within 30 days from the date of this decision. Pursuant to Rule on Appeal 7, RCW vol. 0, we impose upon appellants’ counsel, for failure to observe the Rules on Appeal, terms of one hundred fifty dollars .($150.00) to be paid to respondents’ counsel as attorney’s fees. Beagle v. Beagle, supra.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
413 P.2d 339, 68 Wash. 2d 415, 1966 Wash. LEXIS 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-green-wash-1966.