Neal v. Duke Energy

Fourth Circuit

Neal v. Duke Energy

509 F. App'x 280

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 13, 2013·No. No. 12-2237·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bridgette Neal appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bridgette Neal appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Neal v. Duke Energy, 509 F. App'x 280 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

509 F. App'x 280 (Neal v. Duke Energy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.