Neal v. Department of Corrections
786 N.W.2d 875, 2010 WL 3441090
This text of 786 N.W.2d 875 (Neal v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neal v. Department of Corrections, 786 N.W.2d 875, 2010 WL 3441090 (Mich. 2010).
Opinion
Tracy NEAL, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Kenneth McGinnis, Joan Yukins, Sally Langley, Carol Howes, Robert Salis, Cornell Howard, Martin Tate, Thomas Portman, William Ellison, Christopher Gallagher, Roderick Robey, William Overton, Clarice Stovall, Nancy Zang, John Andrews, Jan Baldwin, Wes Bonney, David Crukshank, Joseph Durigon, David Habitz, Edward Hook, Jack Hutchins, Dennis Iford, Derle Jones, Art Lancaster, Erin Richardson, Anthony Simmons, Fred Welch, Lynn Williams, Charles Williams, Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of the application for leave to appeal is considered and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
786 N.W.2d 875, 2010 WL 3441090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-department-of-corrections-mich-2010.