Neal v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Supreme Court

Neal v. Department of Corrections

786 N.W.2d 875, 2010 WL 3441090

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Neal v. Department of Corrections. Read the opinion of the Court — 482 Mich. 984 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 1, 2010·No. 13895. COA No. 285232·Published

Opinion

786 N.W.2d 875 (2010)

Tracy NEAL, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Kenneth McGinnis, Joan Yukins, Sally Langley, Carol Howes, Robert Salis, Cornell Howard, Martin Tate, Thomas Portman, William Ellison, Christopher Gallagher, Roderick Robey, William Overton, Clarice Stovall, Nancy Zang, John Andrews, Jan Baldwin, Wes Bonney, David Crukshank, Joseph Durigon, David Habitz, Edward Hook, Jack Hutchins, Dennis Iford, Derle Jones, Art Lancaster, Erin Richardson, Anthony Simmons, Fred Welch, Lynn Williams, Charles Williams, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket No. 13895. COA No. 285232.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 1, 2010.

Order

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of the application for leave to appeal is considered and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

786 N.W.2d 875 (2010)

Tracy NEAL, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Kenneth McGinnis, Joan Yukins, Sally Langley, Carol Howes, Robert Salis, Cornell Howard, Martin Tate, Thomas Portman, William Ellison, Christopher Gallagher, Roderick Robey, William Overton, Clarice Stovall, Nancy Zang, John Andrews, Jan Baldwin, Wes Bonney, David Crukshank, Joseph Durigon, David Habitz, Edward Hook, Jack Hutchins, Dennis Iford, Derle Jones, Art Lancaster, Erin Richardson, Anthony Simmons, Fred Welch, Lynn Williams, Charles Williams, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket No. 13895. COA No. 285232.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 1, 2010.

Order

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of the application for leave to appeal is considered and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.

Neal v. Department of Corrections, 786 N.W.2d 875, 2010 WL 3441090 (Mich. 2010).

Pincite

786 N.W.2d 875 (Neal v. Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.