Neal v. CONVERGYS CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Neal v. CONVERGYS CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

330 S.W.3d 872, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 124, 2011 WL 397664

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 8, 2011·No. ED 95058·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*873 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andre Neal (“Neal”) appeals a decision from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) denying Neal unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*873 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andre Neal (“Neal”) appeals a decision from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) denying Neal unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Neal v. CONVERGYS CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., 330 S.W.3d 872, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 124, 2011 WL 397664 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

330 S.W.3d 872 (Neal v. CONVERGYS CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related