Neal v. Collins

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Neal v. Collins

2 N.J.L. 85

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 15, 1806·Published

Opinion

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— One of the reasons assigned for the reversal of this judgment is, that the judgment is entered in [81]*81figures and not in words at length. And this is verified by the record. Therefore according to [63] the case of Cole v. Petty.1 In my opinion reverse.

M’Ilvaine, for plaintiff.

Rossell, J., and Pennington, J. — Concurred.

Judgment reversed.

Cited in Berrian v. State, 2 Zab. 9, 36.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— One of the reasons assigned for the reversal of this judgment is, that the judgment is entered in [81]*81figures and not in words at length. And this is verified by the record. Therefore according to [63] the case of Cole v. Petty.1 In my opinion reverse.

M’Ilvaine, for plaintiff.

Rossell, J., and Pennington, J. — Concurred.

Judgment reversed.

Cited in Berrian v. State, 2 Zab. 9, 36.

Neal v. Collins, 2 N.J.L. 85 (N.J. 1806).

Pincite

2 N.J.L. 85 (Neal v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.