Neal v. Carolina Management
510 S.E.2d 375, 350 N.C. 63, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 6
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Timmons-Goodson, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the opinion and award of the Industrial Commission, is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Industrial Commission for entry of an opinion and award in favor of the plaintiff consistent with this opinion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Neal v. Carolina Management, 510 S.E.2d 375, 350 N.C. 63, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 6 (N.C. 1999).
510 S.E.2d 375 (Neal v. Carolina Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lipscomb v. MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS
716 S.E.2d 345 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
Green v. Austin Quality Foods
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2007
Effingham v. THE KROGER CO.
561 S.E.2d 287 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
Knight v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
562 S.E.2d 434 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
Rhodes v. Hersek Express, Inc.
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2002
Anderson v. Gulistan Carpet, Inc.
550 S.E.2d 237 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
Shoemaker v. Creative Builders
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2001