Neal v. Carolina Management

510 S.E.2d 375, 350 N.C. 63, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 6
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1999
Docket310A98
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 510 S.E.2d 375 (Neal v. Carolina Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neal v. Carolina Management, 510 S.E.2d 375, 350 N.C. 63, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 6 (N.C. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Timmons-Goodson, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the opinion and award of the Industrial Commission, is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Industrial Commission for entry of an opinion and award in favor of the plaintiff consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lipscomb v. MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS
716 S.E.2d 345 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
Green v. Austin Quality Foods
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2007
Effingham v. THE KROGER CO.
561 S.E.2d 287 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
Knight v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
562 S.E.2d 434 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
Rhodes v. Hersek Express, Inc.
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2002
Anderson v. Gulistan Carpet, Inc.
550 S.E.2d 237 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
Shoemaker v. Creative Builders
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2001

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 S.E.2d 375, 350 N.C. 63, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-carolina-management-nc-1999.