Neal v. Bridgette Tara Neal Social Security Trust

District of Columbia

Neal v. Bridgette Tara Neal Social Security Trust

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 30, 2014·No. Civil Action No. 2014-1105·Published

Opinion

FILED

BRIDGETTE TARA NEAL, ) )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. ,, /[

BRIDGETTE TARA NEAL SOClAL ) SECURITY TRUST, et al., ) )

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’ s application to proceed in forma pauperis and her pro se civil complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be

dismissed as frivolous.

The plaintiff posits that the United States Company Corporation created trusts, the Bridgette Tara Neal Social Security Trust and Bridgette Tara Neal Cestui Qne Trust, of which she is the beneficiary See Compl. at l; see z'd. at 6 (page numbers designated by the Court). She further alleges that the defendants have "acquired stocks & bonds" and otherwise have "benefit[ed] from monetary gain, off the Fictitious Corporation, known as BRIDGETTE TARA NEAL and the labor of Bridgette Tara Neal." Ia'. (emphasis in original). The plaintiff now declares these "trusts to be permanently voided, dissolved, and collapsed," id. at 11, and demands that "[a]ll assets . . . be transferred to the direct and total control of the Living Individual, Bridgette Tara Neal, as the Creator/Trustor/Executor/Beneficiary/Title Holder and

Title Owner" of the trust, ia'. at l7.

The complaint is replete with baseless factual contentions and references to statutes having no apparent relevance to the claim the plaintiff purportedly raises. The Court concludes, therefore, that this action must be dismissed. See Neitzke v. Wz'llz'ams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989) (noting judges’ authority not only "to dismiss a claim based on an indisputably meritless legal theory, but also . . . to pierce the veil of the complaint’s factual allegations and dismiss those claims whose factual contentions are clearly baseless"). An Order consistent with this

Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FILED

BRIDGETTE TARA NEAL, ) )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. ,, /[

BRIDGETTE TARA NEAL SOClAL ) SECURITY TRUST, et al., ) )

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’ s application to proceed in forma pauperis and her pro se civil complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be

dismissed as frivolous.

The plaintiff posits that the United States Company Corporation created trusts, the Bridgette Tara Neal Social Security Trust and Bridgette Tara Neal Cestui Qne Trust, of which she is the beneficiary See Compl. at l; see z'd. at 6 (page numbers designated by the Court). She further alleges that the defendants have "acquired stocks & bonds" and otherwise have "benefit[ed] from monetary gain, off the Fictitious Corporation, known as BRIDGETTE TARA NEAL and the labor of Bridgette Tara Neal." Ia'. (emphasis in original). The plaintiff now declares these "trusts to be permanently voided, dissolved, and collapsed," id. at 11, and demands that "[a]ll assets . . . be transferred to the direct and total control of the Living Individual, Bridgette Tara Neal, as the Creator/Trustor/Executor/Beneficiary/Title Holder and

Title Owner" of the trust, ia'. at l7.

The complaint is replete with baseless factual contentions and references to statutes having no apparent relevance to the claim the plaintiff purportedly raises. The Court concludes, therefore, that this action must be dismissed. See Neitzke v. Wz'llz'ams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989) (noting judges’ authority not only "to dismiss a claim based on an indisputably meritless legal theory, but also . . . to pierce the veil of the complaint’s factual allegations and dismiss those claims whose factual contentions are clearly baseless"). An Order consistent with this

Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

DATE:

Neal v. Bridgette Tara Neal Social Security Trust, (D.D.C. 2014).

Pincite

Neal v. Bridgette Tara Neal Social Security Trust (Neal v. Bridgette Tara Neal Social Security Trust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related