Neal v. Black

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Neal v. Black

35 A. 561, 177 Pa. 83, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 953

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 5, 1896

DocketAppeal, No. 243

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 35 A. 561 (Neal v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neal v. Black, 35 A. 561, 177 Pa. 83, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 953 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We find no error in this record that would justify either a reversal or modification of the decree. The learned judge’s [112]*112findings of fact and conclusions of law are substantially correct, and fully warranted tbe decree dismissing the bill at plaintiff’s costs. There appears to be nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion.

The decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

We find no error in this record that would justify either a reversal or modification of the decree. The learned judge’s [112]*112findings of fact and conclusions of law are substantially correct, and fully warranted tbe decree dismissing the bill at plaintiff’s costs. There appears to be nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion.

The decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 A. 561, 177 Pa. 83, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neal-v-black-pa-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack