Neal Rauhauser v. James McGibney and Viaview, Inc.

Opinion

In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-25-00054-CV

___________________________

NEAL RAUHAUSER, Appellant V.

JAMES MCGIBNEY AND VIAVIEW, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 67th District Court Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 067-270669-14

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On March 10, 2025, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us that appellant has not arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, by March 20, 2025, appellant arranged to pay for the clerk’s record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b), 44.3.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: March 27, 2025