Neal Rauhauser v. James McGibney and Viaview, Inc.

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: March 27, 2025
• Docket: 02-25-00054-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00054-CV ___________________________

NEAL RAUHAUSER, Appellant

V.

JAMES MCGIBNEY AND VIAVIEW, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 67th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 067-270669-14

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On March 10, 2025, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible

for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us that appellant has not arranged

to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P.

35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution unless, by March 20, 2025, appellant arranged to pay for the clerk’s

record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b),

44.3.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record,

we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b),

42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: March 27, 2025