Ne-Kah-Wah-She-Tun-Kah v. Work
266 U.S. 595, 45 S. Ct. 224, 69 L. Ed. 458, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 320
This text of 266 U.S. 595 (Ne-Kah-Wah-She-Tun-Kah v. Work) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ne-Kah-Wah-She-Tun-Kah v. Work, 266 U.S. 595, 45 S. Ct. 224, 69 L. Ed. 458, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 320 (1925).
Opinion
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Toop v. Ulysses Land Co.
237 U.S. 580 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham
253 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
266 U.S. 595, 45 S. Ct. 224, 69 L. Ed. 458, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ne-kah-wah-she-tun-kah-v-work-scotus-1925.