Ndue v. Resnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ndue v. Resnick

292 A.D.2d 358, 738 N.Y.S.2d 600, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2177

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 292 A.D.2d 358 (Ndue v. Resnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ndue v. Resnick, 292 A.D.2d 358, 738 N.Y.S.2d 600, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendants North Shore University Hospital, James Walsh, John Sparrow, Robert Alan Boxer, Marci Silverman-Wexler, John Morgan, Ruth Borgen, and Nina Tomei appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated August 14, 2000, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Prudenti, P.J., O’Brien, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendants North Shore University Hospital, James Walsh, John Sparrow, Robert Alan Boxer, Marci Silverman-Wexler, John Morgan, Ruth Borgen, and Nina Tomei appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated August 14, 2000, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Prudenti, P.J., O’Brien, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 A.D.2d 358, 738 N.Y.S.2d 600, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ndue-v-resnick-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack