Ndiaye v. Mukasey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1771

NAFI NDIAYE,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: May 28, 2008 Decided: June 19, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICES OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Lindemann, Assistant Director, Ethan B. Kanter, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nafi Ndiaye, a native and citizen of Mauritania,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen and reconsider. We

have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the

Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Ndiaye’s motion. See

8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for

review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Ndiaye

(B.I.A. July 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -