Ndiaye v. 2123 FDB MPPH LP
This text of Ndiaye v. 2123 FDB MPPH LP (Ndiaye v. 2123 FDB MPPH LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
2123 FDB MPPH LP, Defendant-Respondent,
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Louis L. Nock, J.), entered on or about March 13, 2018, after trial, in favor of defendant dismissing the action.
Per Curiam.
Judgment (Louis L. Nock, J.), dated March 13, 2018, reversed, without costs, and new trial ordered.
The dismissal of the underlying Small Claims action on res judicata grounds did not render substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (see CCA 1807). Plaintiff-tenant's property damage claim against defendant-landlord was not (and could not properly be) litigated in the prior nonpayment proceeding between the parties (see O'Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357 [1981]), since plaintiff seeks damages traditionally within the scope of tort liability, which are more appropriately tried outside the limited sphere of the landlord-tenant proceeding (see 610 W. 142nd St. Owners Corp. v Braxton, 140 Misc 2d 826 [App Term, 1st Dept 1988]).
In remanding the matter for a new trial, we express no view as to the merits of plaintiff's claim.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: May 17, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ndiaye v. 2123 FDB MPPH LP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ndiaye-v-2123-fdb-mpph-lp-nyappterm-2019.