Ndebese v. Signature Real Estate

323 S.W.3d 100, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1463
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 26, 2010
DocketWD 71485
StatusPublished

This text of 323 S.W.3d 100 (Ndebese v. Signature Real Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ndebese v. Signature Real Estate, 323 S.W.3d 100, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1463 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Bariyo Ndebesa appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that Ndebesa was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. On appeal, Ndebesa claims that the Commission’s findings were not supported by competent and substantial evidence. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Missouri Retired Teachers Foundation v. Estes
323 S.W.3d 100 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 S.W.3d 100, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ndebese-v-signature-real-estate-moctapp-2010.