Ndaula v. Zayas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ndaula v. Zayas

108 A.D.3d 633, 968 N.Y.S.2d 384

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 108 A.D.3d 633 (Ndaula v. Zayas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ndaula v. Zayas, 108 A.D.3d 633, 968 N.Y.S.2d 384 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

— Froceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78, inter alia, in effect, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the prosecution of the petitioner in a crimi[634]*634nal action entitled People v Ndaula, commenced against the petitioner in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under indictment No. 1721/11, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The proceeding has been rendered academic, as the petitioner has been sentenced in the underlying criminal action. Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Froceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78, inter alia, in effect, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the prosecution of the petitioner in a crimi[634]*634nal action entitled People v Ndaula, commenced against the petitioner in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under indictment No. 1721/11, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The proceeding has been rendered academic, as the petitioner has been sentenced in the underlying criminal action. Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 A.D.3d 633, 968 N.Y.S.2d 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ndaula-v-zayas-nyappdiv-2013.