N.D. v. Department of Children & Family Services

961 So. 2d 1027, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10981, 2007 WL 2043579
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 2007·No. No. 3D07-734·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the appellee-Department agrees, the trial court has no authority to determine a disputed issue of paternity in a Chapter 39 proceeding. See E.K. v. Dep’t of Children and Family Servs., 874 So.2d 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). The Final Judgment of Paternity entered below is therefore held for naught and vacated. The alleged father, the appellant N.D., having denied paternity, has no standing to object to an order of dependency or the termination of parental rights. If, however, the mother, the Department or another agency desires to establish that paternity, an appropriate proceeding for support or otherwise must be brought in the family division of the circuit court in which the alleged father has the right to a jury trial. See B.J.Y. v. M.A., 617 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1993).

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

N.D. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 961 So. 2d 1027, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10981, 2007 WL 2043579 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

961 So. 2d 1027 (N.D. v. Department of Children & Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

B.J.Y. v. M.A.
617 So. 2d 1061 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
E.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services
874 So. 2d 720 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)