NCR Corp. v. Sonitrol Corp.

626 So. 2d 1073, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11535, 1993 WL 462761
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 12, 1993
DocketNo. 92-278
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 626 So. 2d 1073 (NCR Corp. v. Sonitrol Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
NCR Corp. v. Sonitrol Corp., 626 So. 2d 1073, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11535, 1993 WL 462761 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

MICKLE, Judge.

We reverse the judge of compensation claims’ (JCC’s) order assessing attorney’s fees and costs in favor of appellees. No statutory authority exists for the attorney’s fee award. Further, the costs award is not supported by competent substantial evidence. It is therefore unnecessary for us to address the remaining issues raised on appeal.

BARFIELD and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guckenberger v. Seminole County
979 So. 2d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Lewis v. State
626 So. 2d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
626 So. 2d 1073, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11535, 1993 WL 462761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ncr-corp-v-sonitrol-corp-fladistctapp-1993.