NCNB Texas Natl Bank v. Houk

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 9, 1996
Docket95-20927
StatusUnpublished

This text of NCNB Texas Natl Bank v. Houk (NCNB Texas Natl Bank v. Houk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
NCNB Texas Natl Bank v. Houk, (5th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-20927 Summary Calendar _____________________

NCNB TEXAS NATIONAL BANK, As receiver for First Republicbank Houston NA and KWP FINANCIAL I, INC.,

Plaintiff - Appellees,

versus

ALLEN HOUK, Trustee, Et Al.,

Defendants,

SIU NIN NG, also known as David Ng; PO-SHIN WONG NG

Defendants - Appellants.

________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (CA-H-91-571) ________________________________________________

June 21, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Siu Nin Ng and Po-Shin Wong Ng (Ngs) appeal from the district

court's Order Requiring Turnover, Appointing Receiver, and

Enjoining Persons. They complain that the district court lacked

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. sufficient evidence of ownership of property to grant a turnover;

that it erred by ordering turnover as to unspecified property; that

it lacked sufficient evidence that there was property that could

not be readily attached or levied; and that it erred when it

appointed an unqualified receiver.

Applying Texas law, we review a turnover order for abuse of

discretion. Jacobs v. Adams, 874 S.W.2d 166, 167 (Tex. App. -

Houston 1994, no writ). The decision to appoint a receiver in

turnover proceedings is also within the discretion of the trial

court. Schultz v. Cadle Co., 825 S.W.2d 151, 155 (Tex. App.-

Dallas 1992, writ denied). We find no abuse of discretion in the

application of the Texas Turnover Statute.

AFFIRMED.

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schultz v. Cadle Co.
825 S.W.2d 151 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Jacobs v. Adams
874 S.W.2d 166 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
NCNB Texas Natl Bank v. Houk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ncnb-texas-natl-bank-v-houk-ca5-1996.