N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Paschal
This text of N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Paschal (N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Paschal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 33PA14 Filed 19 December 2014 NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
v. WADE H. PASCHAL, JR., Guardian ad litem for Harley Jessup; REGGIE JESSUP; RANDALL COLLINS JESSUP; and THURMAN JESSUP
On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous
decision of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 752 S.E.2d 775 (2014), affirming
an order entered on 30 November 2012 and reversing and remanding an order of
summary judgment entered on 6 December 2012, both by Judge G. Wayne
Abernathy in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 18
November 2014.
Haywood, Denny & Miller, L.L.P., by Robert E. Levin, for plaintiff-appellant.
Moody, Williams, Roper & Lee, LLP, by C. Todd Roper, for defendant- appellees Harley, Thurman, and Reggie Jessup.
Kluttz, Reamer, Hayes, Randolph, & Adkins, L.L.P., by Michael S. Adkins; and Maginnis Law, PLLC, by T. Shawn Howard, for North Carolina Advocates for Justice, amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Paschal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nc-farm-bureau-mut-ins-co-v-paschal-nc-2014.