Nc Bd. of Pharmacy v. Rules Review Com'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Nc Bd. of Pharmacy v. Rules Review Com'n

637 S.E.2d 515

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 17, 2006·No. No. 673A05.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we reverse the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissent. We further conclude that the petition for *516discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Wake County Superior Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we reverse the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissent. We further conclude that the petition for *516discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Wake County Superior Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Nc Bd. of Pharmacy v. Rules Review Com'n, 637 S.E.2d 515 (N.C. 2006).

Pincite

637 S.E.2d 515 (Nc Bd. of Pharmacy v. Rules Review Com'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.