Nc Bd. of Pharmacy v. Rules Review Com'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Nc Bd. of Pharmacy v. Rules Review Com'n

637 S.E.2d 515

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 17, 2006

DocketNo. 673A05.

StatusPublished

This text of 637 S.E.2d 515 (Nc Bd. of Pharmacy v. Rules Review Com'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nc Bd. of Pharmacy v. Rules Review Com'n, 637 S.E.2d 515 (N.C. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we reverse the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissent. We further conclude that the petition for *516discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Wake County Superior Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we reverse the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissent. We further conclude that the petition for *516discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Wake County Superior Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

637 S.E.2d 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nc-bd-of-pharmacy-v-rules-review-comn-nc-2006.