Nazworth v. State

673 So. 2d 985, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5476, 1996 WL 279900
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 29, 1996
DocketNo. 95-3441
StatusPublished

This text of 673 So. 2d 985 (Nazworth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nazworth v. State, 673 So. 2d 985, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5476, 1996 WL 279900 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final summary judgment under review and remand for further proceedings because genuine issues of material fact exist in the record before us. “Summary judgment is only appropriate when the movant has shown conclusively that no genuine issues of material fact remain; every inference is drawn in favor of the party [986]*986against whom summary judgment is sought[, and] ... ‘[p]artieular caution should be employed when granting summary judgment in negligence actions.’ ” White v. Whiddon, 670 So.2d 131, 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (citations omitted).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

BOOTH, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. Whiddon
670 So. 2d 131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 So. 2d 985, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5476, 1996 WL 279900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nazworth-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.