NAZIEN v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

NAZIEN v. State

36 So. 3d 184, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8159, 2010 WL 2292043

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 9, 2010

Docket3D07-2966

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 So. 3d 184 (NAZIEN v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NAZIEN v. State, 36 So. 3d 184, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8159, 2010 WL 2292043 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Williams, 967 So.2d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (holding that the odor of burnt marijuana emanat *185 ing from a vehicle constitutes probable cause to search the occupants of the vehicle); State v. T.P., 835 So.2d 1277, 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (holding that the smell of burnt marijuana alone provided probable cause to search the defendant’s car for contraband).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Williams, 967 So.2d 941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (holding that the odor of burnt marijuana emanat *185 ing from a vehicle constitutes probable cause to search the occupants of the vehicle); State v. T.P., 835 So.2d 1277, 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (holding that the smell of burnt marijuana alone provided probable cause to search the defendant’s car for contraband).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 So. 3d 184, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8159, 2010 WL 2292043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nazien-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack