Nazario v. State

554 So. 2d 515, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 2, 1990 WL 890
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 4, 1990·No. No. 73665·Published

Opinion

BARKETT, Justice.

We have for review Nazario v. State, 535 So.2d 295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). This case presents the same issue as that presented in Bostick v. State, 554 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1989). We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. For reasons expressed in Bost-ick, we quash the opinion of the district court and remand for proceedings consistent therewith.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and SHAW and KOGAN, JJ., concur. OVERTON, McDonald and GRIMES, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nazario v. State, 554 So. 2d 515, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 2, 1990 WL 890 (Fla. 1990).

554 So. 2d 515 (Nazario v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bostick v. State
554 So. 2d 1153 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Nazario v. State
535 So. 2d 295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)