Nazario v. Kohtio

49 A.D.3d 429, 852 N.Y.2d 841

This text of 49 A.D.3d 429 (Nazario v. Kohtio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nazario v. Kohtio, 49 A.D.3d 429, 852 N.Y.2d 841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Summary judgment was properly denied in this action where [430]*430plaintiff alleges he was injured when he was struck by defendant’s motor vehicle while crossing the street. Defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law since there exist triable issues as to whether defendant exercised due care to avoid the collision (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1146), and whether plaintiff was comparatively negligent by failing to exercise due care while admittedly crossing the street at a point other than an intersection or a crosswalk (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1152 [a]; Ryan v Budget Rent a Car, 37 AD3d 698 [2007]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ryan v. Budget Rent A Car
37 A.D.3d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.3d 429, 852 N.Y.2d 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nazario-v-kohtio-nyappdiv-2008.