Nazario v. City of New York

27 A.D.3d 439, 810 N.Y.S.2d 342
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 7, 2006·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated February 18, 2005, as granted that branch of her motion which was to compel the defendant City of New York to produce seven witnesses for examinations before trial only to the extent of directing that defendant to produce Officer Wein for an examination before trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To show that additional examinations before trial are necessary, the plaintiff is required to demonstrate “(1) that the representatives already deposed had insufficient knowledge, or were otherwise inadequate, and (2) there is a substantial likelihood that the persons sought for depositions possess information which is material and necessary to the prosecution of the case” (Zollner v City of New York, 204 AD2d 626, 627 [1994]; see Uvaydova v New York Tel. Co., 226 AD2d 626, 627 [1996]). Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff’s motion only to the extent of directing the defendant City of New York to produce Officer Wein for an examination before trial. Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nazario v. City of New York, 27 A.D.3d 439, 810 N.Y.S.2d 342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

27 A.D.3d 439 (Nazario v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gomez v. State
106 A.D.3d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Trueforge Global Machinery Corp. v. Viraj Group
84 A.D.3d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Spohn-Konen v. Town of Brookhaven
74 A.D.3d 1049 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)