Nazareth Gates, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. John Collier

525 F.2d 965, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 13465
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 1976
Docket75--2397
StatusPublished

This text of 525 F.2d 965 (Nazareth Gates, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. John Collier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nazareth Gates, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. John Collier, 525 F.2d 965, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 13465 (5th Cir. 1976).

Opinion

525 F.2d 965

Nazareth GATES et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
and
United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
John COLLIER et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 75--2397.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 8, 1976.

Roy S. Haber, Boulder, Colo., Herman Wilson, David Lipman, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Roger Googe, James M. Ward, Asst. Attys. Gen., A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., Jackson, Miss., for defendants-appellees.

Shawn Moore, Paul S. Lawrence, Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Washington, D.C., for the United States.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi.

Before COLEMAN, CLARK and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is taken from the district court's refusal to modify its prior injunctive order in response to allegations of racial discrimination toward inmates in the employment and training of personnel at the Mississippi State Penitentiary; and from the modification of the prisoner mail regulation contained in the prior order which plaintiffs asserted was modified in a manner which violates the ruling of Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396, 94 S.Ct. 1800, 40 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974). The district court rendered a full opinion explicating its reasoning, Gates v. Collier, 390 F.Supp. 482 (N.D., Miss., 1975).

We find no abuse of the broad discretion vested in the trial court to consider revision of an ongoing injunctive decree. On the reported opinion of the district court, supra, its judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Procunier v. Martinez
416 U.S. 396 (Supreme Court, 1974)
Gates v. Collier
390 F. Supp. 482 (N.D. Mississippi, 1975)
Gates v. Collier
525 F.2d 965 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
525 F.2d 965, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 13465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nazareth-gates-and-united-states-of-america-plaintiff-intervenor-v-john-ca5-1976.