Naylor v. Dixon

90 S.E. 74, 145 Ga. 833, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 504
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 14, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 90 S.E. 74 (Naylor v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Naylor v. Dixon, 90 S.E. 74, 145 Ga. 833, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 504 (Ga. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An accusation in a city court charged Prank Naylor, in two counts, with a violation of the prohibition law, and he was found guilty on the second count. He moved for a new trial, which was refused, and thereupon he sued out a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the verdict stated that “We, the jury, find the defendant, Prank Taylor, guilty on the second count, and not guilty on the first count.” Held, that this did not render the verdict invalid, so as to authorize the discharge of the prisoner under a writ of habeas corpus. Martin v. State, 25 Ga. 494; Harrell V. Avera, 139 Ga. 340 (77 S. E. 160).

Judgment affirmed.

By five Justices, all concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. State
25 Ga. 494 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1858)
Harrell v. Avera
77 S.E. 160 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 S.E. 74, 145 Ga. 833, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naylor-v-dixon-ga-1916.