Navratil v. Smart

373 So. 2d 544, 1979 La. LEXIS 6833
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 2, 1979
DocketNo. 64946
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 373 So. 2d 544 (Navratil v. Smart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Navratil v. Smart, 373 So. 2d 544, 1979 La. LEXIS 6833 (La. 1979).

Opinion

In re Boris F. Navratil applying for supervisory writs, and writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of East Baton Rouge. No. 223,154.

Granted. The defendant has retained possession of the vehicle without any legal right to do so. The owner is entitled to an injunction to restore his possession of the vehicle pending trial on the merits of the defendant’s claim for towing charges and storage expenses. See Lusco v. McNeese, 86 So.2d 226 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1956) and cases therein cited. Furthermore, an injunction may lie against an illegal act.

SUMMERS, C. J., absent. DENNIS, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Navratil v. Smart
400 So. 2d 268 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
373 So. 2d 544, 1979 La. LEXIS 6833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/navratil-v-smart-la-1979.