Navios Corp. v. National Maritime Union of America

Third Circuit

Navios Corp. v. National Maritime Union of America

359 F.2d 853, 62 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2128

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 2, 1966

DocketNos. 15576, 15577

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 359 F.2d 853 (Navios Corp. v. National Maritime Union of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Navios Corp. v. National Maritime Union of America, 359 F.2d 853, 62 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2128 (3d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These appeals are civil actions for damages under Section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, as amended 29 U.S.C. § 187. Plaintiffs-appellants are foreign flag steamship companies. The claims arise out of the concerted picketing campaign on the part of the Union to organize the alien seamen employed by appellants.

Judge Wood in the district court held that the Act does not apply to these suits which allege damages by foreign owned and operated ships resulting [854]*854from picketing by respondent. He concluded “ * * * that Congress intended the L.M.R.A. to provide a statutory remedy for American concerns and American unions only, in their labor disputes.” We fully agree with that decision. Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo, 353 U.S. 138, 77 S.Ct. 699, 1 L.Ed.2d 709 (1957). McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional, 372 U.S. 10, 83 S.Ct. 671, 9 L.Ed.2d 547 (1962); Incres Steamship Co., Ltd. v. International Maritime Workers Union, 372 U.S. 24, 27, 83 S.Ct. 611, 9 L.Ed.2d 557 (1962).

The judgments of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These appeals are civil actions for damages under Section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, as amended 29 U.S.C. § 187. Plaintiffs-appellants are foreign flag steamship companies. The claims arise out of the concerted picketing campaign on the part of the Union to organize the alien seamen employed by appellants.

Judge Wood in the district court held that the Act does not apply to these suits which allege damages by foreign owned and operated ships resulting [854]*854from picketing by respondent. He concluded “ * * * that Congress intended the L.M.R.A. to provide a statutory remedy for American concerns and American unions only, in their labor disputes.” We fully agree with that decision. Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo, 353 U.S. 138, 77 S.Ct. 699, 1 L.Ed.2d 709 (1957). McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional, 372 U.S. 10, 83 S.Ct. 671, 9 L.Ed.2d 547 (1962); Incres Steamship Co., Ltd. v. International Maritime Workers Union, 372 U.S. 24, 27, 83 S.Ct. 611, 9 L.Ed.2d 557 (1962).

The judgments of the district court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

359 F.2d 853, 62 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/navios-corp-v-national-maritime-union-of-america-ca3-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack