Navid, Inc. and Nader Daryapayma v. Inland Western Euless Limited Partnership
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-10-00436-CV
|
Navid, Inc. and Nader Daryapayma |
APPELLANTS |
|
|
V. |
||
|
Inland Western Euless Limited Partnership |
APPELLEE |
|
------------
FROM County Court at Law No. 1 OF Tarrant COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
We have considered “Appellants' Motion To Dismiss.” It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DELIVERED: June 30, 2011
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Navid, Inc. and Nader Daryapayma v. Inland Western Euless Limited Partnership (Navid, Inc. and Nader Daryapayma v. Inland Western Euless Limited Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.