Navid, Inc. and Nader Daryapayma v. Inland Western Euless Limited Partnership

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 30, 2011·No. 02-10-00436-CV·Published

Opinion

02-10-436-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00436-CV

Navid, Inc. and Nader Daryapayma

APPELLANTS

V.

Inland Western Euless Limited Partnership

APPELLEE

------------

FROM County Court at Law No. 1 OF Tarrant COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellants' Motion To Dismiss.”  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DELIVERED:  June 30, 2011



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Navid, Inc. and Nader Daryapayma v. Inland Western Euless Limited Partnership, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Navid, Inc. and Nader Daryapayma v. Inland Western Euless Limited Partnership (Navid, Inc. and Nader Daryapayma v. Inland Western Euless Limited Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.