Navarro v. Yosemite Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Navarro v. Yosemite Insurance Co.

254 So. 2d 33

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 1971·No. No. 71-426·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the entry of a summary final judgment declaring that the appellant, as an omnibus insured, was not covered under the named insured’s motorist endorsement. The point on appeal here has been dealt with by our Supreme Court in the recent case of Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Fla.1971, 252 So.2d 229. The court’s holding therein is controlling authority for reversal of the judgment entered in the instant case.

Therefore the judgment appealed is reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the entry of a summary final judgment declaring that the appellant, as an omnibus insured, was not covered under the named insured’s motorist endorsement. The point on appeal here has been dealt with by our Supreme Court in the recent case of Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Fla.1971, 252 So.2d 229. The court’s holding therein is controlling authority for reversal of the judgment entered in the instant case.

Therefore the judgment appealed is reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Navarro v. Yosemite Insurance Co., 254 So. 2d 33 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

254 So. 2d 33 (Navarro v. Yosemite Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related