Navarro v. Yosemite Insurance Co.

254 So. 2d 33
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 2, 1971
DocketNo. 71-426
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 So. 2d 33 (Navarro v. Yosemite Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Navarro v. Yosemite Insurance Co., 254 So. 2d 33 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the entry of a summary final judgment declaring that the appellant, as an omnibus insured, was not covered under the named insured’s motorist endorsement. The point on appeal here has been dealt with by our Supreme Court in the recent case of Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Fla.1971, 252 So.2d 229. The court’s holding therein is controlling authority for reversal of the judgment entered in the instant case.

Therefore the judgment appealed is reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holcomb v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
495 S.W.2d 155 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1973)
Munday v. State
254 So. 2d 33 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 So. 2d 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/navarro-v-yosemite-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1971.