Navarro v. State

670 So. 2d 1174, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3341, 1996 WL 148854
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 3, 1996
DocketNo. 95-2032
StatusPublished

This text of 670 So. 2d 1174 (Navarro v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Navarro v. State, 670 So. 2d 1174, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3341, 1996 WL 148854 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Claudio Navarro, appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. After careful review of the record, we find that the motion was neither a successive motion nor untimely filed. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Ray v. State, 480 So.2d 228, 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (movant entitled to evidentiary hearing on sworn claim of affirmative misadvice of counsel that movant would receive gain time on a mandatory minimum sentence); Eady v. State, 604 So.2d 559 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ray v. State
480 So. 2d 228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Eady v. State
604 So. 2d 559 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 So. 2d 1174, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3341, 1996 WL 148854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/navarro-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.