Navarro v. Lenchner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Navarro v. Lenchner

95 A.D.2d 849, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18793

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 95 A.D.2d 849 (Navarro v. Lenchner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Navarro v. Lenchner, 95 A.D.2d 849, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action on an instrument for the payment of money only commenced by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, plaintiff appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Miller, J.), dated October 19, 1982, which denied his motion for summary judgment and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated December 20, 1982, as upon reargument, adhered to the original decision. Appeal from the order dated October 19, 1982, dismissed. That order was [850]*850superseded by the order dated December 20, 1982, made upon reargument. Order dated December 20, 1982, affirmed, insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Defendant is awarded one bill of costs. Brown, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action on an instrument for the payment of money only commenced by motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, plaintiff appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Miller, J.), dated October 19, 1982, which denied his motion for summary judgment and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated December 20, 1982, as upon reargument, adhered to the original decision. Appeal from the order dated October 19, 1982, dismissed. That order was [850]*850superseded by the order dated December 20, 1982, made upon reargument. Order dated December 20, 1982, affirmed, insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Defendant is awarded one bill of costs. Brown, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.D.2d 849, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/navarro-v-lenchner-nyappdiv-1983.